W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > February 2010

RE: wrapper-prefix and wrapper-namespace on p:data

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:29:16 -0500
Message-ID: <997C307BEB90984EBE935699389EC41CB8B3E5@CORPUSMX70C.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> Sigh. There was *no* point in putting wrapper-prefix and
> wrapper-namespace on p:data. You can't compute the value of the
> wrapper dynamically.

That is true, but maybe there is some value for some people in allowing:

<p:data wrapper="foo" wrapper-namespace="http://bar.com"/>

as an equivalent of:

<p:data wrapper="bar:foo" xmlns:bar="http://bar.com"/>


You don't have to think of a prefix and create a binding for it, plus it
is consistent (at least conceptually) with the wrapper-* options of some
of the steps.

But I don't think strongly about this.

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:30:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:27 UTC