An XProc user pointed out to me that the following sentence (Section 2.1, Steps) is not entirely correct for p:try: "The runtime semantics of a multi-container step are that it behaves as if it evaluated exactly one of its subpipelines. In this sense, they function like compound steps." Clearly, p:try may evaluate (parts of) both sub-pipelines. Regards, VojtechReceived on Friday, 25 September 2009 16:03:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 September 2009 16:03:07 GMT