- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:48:28 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On 12 Oct 2009, at 08:48, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote: > But the dependency between the two steps must still be preserved. > Simply > replacing the p:pipe binding would break the dependency graph. I don't really understand why this is important, given that if there's no data passing between them then there is no dependency between them. But I will defer to the implementers. > All in all, I think your proposal does not differ that much from the > latest draft. The only significant difference is the p:import > requirement :) Yes, my proposal is an explicit attempt to remove the <p:import> requirement. If you want to keep it, my ask is that somehow it's made clear what happens when you have a pipeline A that imports the XProc 2.0 library and a library B that imports the XProc 1.0 library. And that what happens is not that there's an error. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 08:48:58 UTC