W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Another take on versioning

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:21:46 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2k4z6qavp.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
"David A. Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> writes:
> Rereading the proposal I realized it says exactly the opposite. It
> says that missing version implies "the latest version". Could you
> explain the rationale/value in that interpretation over having it
> imply "1.0" ?

It seemed most consistent with the status quo. In fact, if we had a version
attribute, it probably would make sense to either make it required or make
the default 1.0.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The First Amendment is often
http://nwalsh.com/            | inconvenient. But that is besides the
                              | point. Inconvenience does not absolve
                              | the government of its obligation to
                              | tolerate speech.--Justice Anthony
                              | Kennedy, in 91-155
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 13:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 October 2009 13:22:22 GMT