I think the p:group is a bit verbose on p:try, have you considered creating an implied p:group if left out ? If a user wants to reuse then its up to them to explicitly define (or better yet, reuse the try step itself). thx for considering, Jim FullerReceived on Sunday, 29 March 2009 12:36:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 29 March 2009 12:36:48 GMT