- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:05:37 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Hi, I think you are right and that I got it wrong when implementing it (and creating the test). The change you are proposing definitely makes things clearer. Regards, Vojtech > The spec says: > > ...[a] node that matches the specified match pattern is replaced with > a new element node whose QName is the value specified in the wrapper > option. The content of that new element is a copy of the original, > matching node. > > I don't think that the wrap process recurses into matched nodes. The > spec is ambiguously worded, however, and I propose the following > change to fix it: > > When the match pattern does not match the document node, each node > that matches the specified match pattern is replaced with a new > element node whose QName is the value specified in the wrapper > option. The content of that new element is a copy of the original, > matching node. The wrap step performs a "shallow" wrapping, it does > not process the content of a matching node for further matches. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The trip doesn't exist that > can set you > http://nwalsh.com/ | beyond the reach of cravings, fits of > | temper, or fears. If it did, the human > | race would be off there in a body.-- > | Seneca >
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 14:06:32 UTC