2009/1/29 ? wrote: >> Might I ask you where you found it? The link on http://xproc.org/ >> points to a draft dated 2008-01-28 (typo?) > Yes, it is a typo in the new draft, the year should be 2009. Ok :-) Thanks, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 13:44:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 January 2009 13:44:45 GMT