W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2009

RE: multipart/@boundary

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:36:20 -0500
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870E28AA33@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>

> > But I guess that the real question is: Does/can having the boundary
> > information in the response cause any issues?
>   Maybe not.  But having it required could maybe be an issue for an
> implementation, I am not sure the existing APIs for HTTP do provide
> this info.

At least Calabash can handle it, judging from the fact that it passes
the test: http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/http-request-005.xml.
Calabash is, I believe, using plain java.net.* functionality.

Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 13:37:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC