Re: 2.6.1.1, error code not defined

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:

> 2008/12/15  <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>:
>>
>>> An option that has neither a specified value nor a default value will
>>> not appear as an in-scope variable. Consequently, an attempt to refer
>>> to that variable will raise an error.
>>>
>>> Mostly the CR defines the error code when first mentioned. Not done in
>>> this case?
>>> XS0010?
>>> XS0018?
>>> XS0031?
>>>
>>
>> This one is covered by dynamic error err:XD0023:
>
> How about adding that to the text of the CR to make
> it explicit which error should be reported, as has been done
> elsewhere.

It's in the last paragraph of the ancestor section. I'm not sure repeating
it in a note is going to be the least confusing thing.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man is not necessarily intelligent
http://nwalsh.com/            | because he has plenty of ideas, any
                              | more than he is a good general because
                              | he has plenty of soldiers.-- Chamfort