W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2009

Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:36:43 +0200
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0904281136j35c1605dqa1ed5d68f65705fb@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

2009/4/28 Norman Walsh wrote:

> I've updated that section, changing the requirement to a SHOULD and
> making explicit reference to HTTP semantics. Please let me know if you
> are unhappy with this resolution.

  Referring to the RFC is the right thing to do, IMHO.  Thanks,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:37:23 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?"
Previous message: Norman Walsh: "Re: Rejecting invalid/unsupported p:serialization"
In reply to: Norman Walsh: "Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?"
Next in thread: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?"
Reply: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:37:24 GMT