Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?

2009/4/28 Norman Walsh wrote:

> I've updated that section, changing the requirement to a SHOULD and
> making explicit reference to HTTP semantics. Please let me know if you
> are unhappy with this resolution.

  Referring to the RFC is the right thing to do, IMHO.  Thanks,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:37:23 UTC