Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare

James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
> wondering if p:compare p:output should really be non-primary ... from
> a DWIM pov I think that we will want to 80% of the time use a result

The WG considered this question on the 23 Apr 2009 telcon and decided not
to make this change. Please let us know if you are unsatisfied by this
resolution.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than anyone else, he
                              | sets less value on his own estimate
                              | than on the opinions of others.--Marcus
                              | Aurelius