W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2009

Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:51:57 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m27i1fje76.fsf@nwalsh.com>
mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> writes:
> Why does it have no name ?
> Couldn't we just keep the name of the primary output port ?

I guess it could, but that might introduce real subtlety considering
how far back you might have to look to find the named port. (Consider
a step that ends with a call to a pipeline that ends with a call to a
pipeline that ends with a step that has an output port with a name.)

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We cannot put off living until we are
http://nwalsh.com/            | ready. The most salient characteristic
                              | of life is its coerciveness: it is
                              | always urgent, 'here and now' without
                              | any possible postponement. Life is
                              | fired at us point blank.--José Ortega Y
                              | Gasset

Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 19:52:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC