"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > It sound good to me. You are using err:XX0063 instead of err:XC0063 > because err:XC0063 does not yet exist and you are not sure whether the > proposal will stay? Neither, I just ham-fingered the code :-) it should be XC0063. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Most human beings have an almost http://nwalsh.com/ | infinite capacity for taking things for | granted.--Aldous HuxleyReceived on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:39:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:39:40 GMT