Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > I noticed that the Relax NG schema for XProc > (http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/schemas/xproc.rng) defines (and uses) > the types WithOptionValue, VariableValue and WithParamValue in addition > to WithOptionSelect, VariableSelect and WithParamSelect. I understand > why there is OptionValue and OptionSelect, but I don't think that having > the same for p:with-option, p:variable and p:with-param is actually > correct. Or is it? No, it's not. Nice catch! I think OptionValue is wrong too, we only need OptionDeclaration and OptionSelect. (I wonder if I should change the pattern names now that we don't need the select/value distinction? Probably not worth the trouble...) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If you understand: things are as they http://nwalsh.com/ | are. If you do not understand: things | are as they are.Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 17:27:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 April 2009 17:27:17 GMT