Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > Is the sentence about xml:base really what we want here? I mean, do we > really want to use a hash value (which is essentially a hex string) as a > base URI? Per the 26 Feb minutes, we decided to allow it, even if it's stupid. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Are you not the future of all the http://nwalsh.com/ | memories stored within you? The future | of the past?--Paul ValéryReceived on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 22:47:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 April 2009 22:47:08 GMT