- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:21:44 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 14:22:27 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
[...]
> I've attempted to address this issue by rewording 2.10 and the corresponding
> section for Variables so that the specifics are left to the syntax sections.
> I've also made it explicit that the value of each must be either a string
> or an xs:untypedAtomic.
The WG concluded that this was sufficient.
Please let me know if this resolves your concerns.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Oh well, no matter what happens,
http://nwalsh.com/ | there's always death.-- Napoleon
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 14:22:27 UTC