W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > September 2008

Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:28:32 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m27i901er3.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:

>   1/ the format of the report is not fixed, maybe you want
> to precise it is SVRL or implementation-defined (I wouldn't
> do the later)
>
>   2/ Schematron can report validation failures (with
> sch:assert), but also successes (with sch:report), so I
> wouldn't say "If any assertions fail."
>
>   Personally I would _always_ output an _SVRL_ report.

What's SVRL?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The function of the imagination is not
http://nwalsh.com/            | to make strange things settled, so much
                              | as it is to make settled things
                              | strange.--G. K. Chesterton
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 14:29:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 September 2008 14:29:15 GMT