Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron

Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> writes:

> But there should be at least another option to specify "phase".

Ok.

> If you will look at Schematron spec (available at
> http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html) you
> will see in section 6.1 that Schematron validation can be also affected
> by a list of external variables, but I have never seen this used in
> practise, so might be there is no need to add this. But phase should be
> definitively there.

So we should add parameters as well, I think.

Is that sufficient?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If we lived alone in a featureless
http://nwalsh.com/            | desert we should learn to place the
                              | individual grains of sand in a moral or
                              | aesthetic hierarchy.--Michael Frayn