Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> writes: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 09:03 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: > [...] >> Does this justification satisfy you? > > Yes, that works. Thank you, Dan. And thanks for catching this detail in the spec. I've made the changes, you can see them in the latest editor's draft starting at http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#f.base-uri If you're unsatisfied with this resolution, please let us know. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In science, "fact" can only mean http://nwalsh.com/ | "confirmed to such a degree that it | would be perverse to withhold | provisional assent." I suppose that | apples might start to rise tomorrow, | but the possibility does not merit | equal time in physics | classrooms.--Stephen J. GouldReceived on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:11 GMT