- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:39:51 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:10 UTC
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 09:03 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> [...]
>> Does this justification satisfy you?
>
> Yes, that works.
Thank you, Dan. And thanks for catching this detail in the spec.
I've made the changes, you can see them in the latest editor's draft
starting at http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#f.base-uri
If you're unsatisfied with this resolution, please let us know.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In science, "fact" can only mean
http://nwalsh.com/ | "confirmed to such a degree that it
| would be perverse to withhold
| provisional assent." I suppose that
| apples might start to rise tomorrow,
| but the possibility does not merit
| equal time in physics
| classrooms.--Stephen J. Gould
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:10 UTC