Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri

On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 11:35 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2008, at 09:54, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > Dan Connolly writes:
> >
> >> Whether they are aliases of XPath 1.0 or XPath 2.0 functions
> >> makes no difference; they're still aliases.
> >
> > I think perhaps you misunderstood.  There _is no_ XPath 1.0 function
> > which has the relevant behaviour.  So we have defined an extension
> > function _for XPath 1.0_ whose functionality is defined to be the
> > XPath 1.0 equivalent of an XPath 2.0 function.
> 
> 
> Perhaps Dan's point is that we should use the XPath 2.0 function  
> namespace (http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions) for those functions  
> rather than co-opting them into our own namespace.

Yes... that's the "remove" option.

Perhaps Henry's reply is part of the "justify" option,
though I still don't really understand it.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E