- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:59:55 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2008/10/3 Norman Walsh wrote: > I understand your concern, but the WG is trying to be > pragmatic. So do I. I thought that being not able to rely on the output format would make this step totally unusable, but Luis remined me that I could simply test what the report root element or namespace is (and so infer what the format is.) A shame that I didn't think about that myself :-( So at the end of the day I think I am satisfied by the WG's decision (including reports as well as asserts, and not setting the output format.) Thanks for having taken that into account. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 14:00:30 UTC