Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect

Florent Georges wrote:
> 2008/10/2 Norman Walsh wrote:
> 
>> The WG agreed to suggest that the output SHOULD be SVRL.
> 
>   That's better than nothing.  On the other side, that means that one
> can not rely on the step's output format, thus she couldn't use the
> report output to transform it in HTML for instance, nor to report any
> meaningful info to the user in any way.
> 
>   Maybe we could have an optional option to set the expected report
> format (html, svrl, or an implementation-defined value) ?

You can do an XPath test (with p:choose) to evaluate the report's 
outcome to achieve the same kind of functionality without adding a new 
option to the step. Do you think that it suffices?

Cheers,

Rui