W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2008

[closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:52:08 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2abdmc2bb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:

>   In the WD of 2008-08-14, in the section ยง7.2.5
> p:validate-with-schematron, one can read:
>
>     If any assertions fail, the reports that they generate
>     are produced on the report output.
>
>   1/ the format of the report is not fixed, maybe you want
> to precise it is SVRL or implementation-defined (I wouldn't
> do the later)
>
>   2/ Schematron can report validation failures (with
> sch:assert), but also successes (with sch:report), so I
> wouldn't say "If any assertions fail."
>
>   Personally I would _always_ output an _SVRL_ report.

The WG agreed to suggest that the output SHOULD be SVRL. We think that
the output from both assertions and positive reports should appear on
the report port.

We addressed this comment with the following change:

<para>Schematron assertions and reports, if any,
<rfc2119>must</rfc2119> appear on the <port>report</port> port. The
output <rfc2119>should</rfc2119> be in <citetitle>Schematron
Validation Report Language</citetitle> (SVRL).</para>

Please let us know if you are not satisfied.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In the course of a full life, one must
http://nwalsh.com/            | be prepared to abandon one's baggage.

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 17:52:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC