W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2008

Re: XSLT 2 and xsl:result-document

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:14:28 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m263m9yze3.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
> Just a question: How does exsl:document relate to this?

Good question. On the one hand, it's not clear how much we can say
about extensions, but in this case, I think that they should be
treated just like xsl:result-documents in XSLT 2.0.

Which I think is fine except that we need to soften the statement
about the secondary result port in the XSLT 1.0 case.

Right now it says:

  If XSLT 1.0 is used, an empty sequence of documents MUST appear on
  the secondary port.

I think we should reword that to:

  If XSLT 1.0 is used, an empty sequence of documents will appear on
  the secondary port, unless extension elements or functions are used
  to write secondary results.
                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Debugging is 99% complete most of the
http://nwalsh.com/            | time--Fred Brooks, jr.

Received on Thursday, 27 November 2008 15:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC