In 2.6.2.1 Processor XPath Context, I think we've botched the description of the static context. We've made each of "Statically known namespaces", "In-scope variables", "Base URI" depend on things that are only known dynamically. That seems just wrong. I think we should say (perhaps "have said", since I'm not sure I want to try to fix this before we go to CR, though I'm game if everyone quickly signals assent) that those are the values in the *dynamic context*. In the *static context*, we should say: Statically known namespaces: None In-scope variables: None Base URI Implementation defined. That's the only thing that makes sense, I think. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Some people can stay longer in an hour http://nwalsh.com/ | than others can in a weekReceived on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 12:48:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 November 2008 12:48:08 GMT