Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: >> Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: >> >> > But I still think that S0044 should make it more clear that >> it is not >> > only about the XProc schema... >> >> I've added >> >> In particular, the presence of atomic steps for which there is no >> visible declaration may raise this error. >> >> Does that help? >> > > I think so. Thanks. > > Regards, > Vojtech Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A proof tells us where to concentrate http://nwalsh.com/ | our doubts.-- AnonymousReceived on Monday, 10 November 2008 13:09:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 November 2008 13:09:16 GMT