Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > Is this intentional? If so, why don't we just say that it is a dynamic > error if the 'path' option is not specified? Or even better, why not > make 'path' required on p:directory-list? That sure makes sense to me. Why did we think path on directory-list should be optional? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Not everyone can live upstream. http://nwalsh.com/ |Received on Sunday, 9 November 2008 19:11:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 9 November 2008 19:11:56 GMT