W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2008

Re: err:XS0036 vs. err:XS0054

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:53:38 +0100
Message-ID: <21d9ade60811060753v3631b6abw5422f5f34820d9c6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org


Yes it surely is

Xmlizer

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:51 AM,  <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't err:XS0054 actually a subset of err:XS0036?
>
>

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:51:08 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Norman Walsh: "Re: Evaluating replace on string-replace"
Previous message: Rui Lopes: "Re: Storing binary data"
In reply to: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com: "err:XS0036 vs. err:XS0054"
Next in thread: Norman Walsh: "Re: err:XS0036 vs. err:XS0054"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:51:08 GMT