W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2008

Re: xproc article on ibm

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:44:43 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60806250244x6fc68efch462d53db4bb5a922@mail.gmail.com>
To: "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Cc: "Steven Livingstone-Perez" <weblivz@hotmail.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
And also you can vectorize your image in SVG ...

Xmlizer



On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:01 AM, James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Steven Livingstone-Perez
> > I look forward to seeing more implementations also - I had been writing
> something that was a more general case (Xml/Xslt being a specific case).
>
> they are coming ...
>
> > I'm still trying to figure out the pros and cons of passing, say a base64
> encoded image (and I guess its associated metadata) through XProc as opposed
> to just using binary as was my original intention.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> remember XProc (and all its steps) only accepts XML documents as its
> input so trying to manipulate a base64 encoded image would have to be
> performed in the context of this data set within an XML document
> (perhaps containing the associated metadata you mention).
>
> there are other standards for embedding metadata in an image....
> something like Adobe XMP(1) and I could imagine that an XProc
> implementation could implement an extension step to work with these
> types of images.
>
> cheers, Jim Fuller
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1- http://www.adobe.com/products/xmp/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 09:45:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 June 2008 09:45:20 GMT