W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2008

[closed] Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:34:41 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2wspz6jz2.fsf@nwalsh.com>

I think this issue has been overtaken by our recent syntax changes.
If you disagree, please feel free to raise this issue again in our
next Last Call :-)

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#dt-subpipeline
| since the step attribute can refer to a pipeline name, might be useful
| to clarify this explicitly under the p:pipe section.
| cheers, Jim Fuller

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Linux. Because rebooting is for
http://nwalsh.com/            | hardware upgrades.

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:34:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC