W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2008

Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:42:00 -0500
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC787097F9CAD@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>

Hi all,

Since the p:pipeline now always contains an implict "source" input port
and an implicit "result" output port, I wonder if the same cannot be
done with the parameter inputs.

Section 2.5 says:

"Additionally, if a p:pipeline does not declare any parameter input
ports, but contains a step which has a primary parameter input port,
then an implicit primary parameter input port (named 'parameters') will
be added to the pipeline. (If the pipeline declares an ordinary input
named 'parameters', the implicit primary parameter input port will be
named 'parameters1'. If that's not available, then 'parameters2', etc.
until an available name is found.)"

Cannot this be changed to something like:

"All p:pipeline pipelines have an implicit primary parameter input port
named 'parameters'. Any parameter input ports that the p:pipeline
declares explicitly are in addition to this port and may not be declared
primary."


Regards,
Vojtech


--
Vojtech Toman
Principal Software Engineer
EMC Corporation

Aert van Nesstraat 45
3012 CA Rotterdam
The Netherlands

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:38:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:38:17 GMT