W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2008

[closed] Re: proposed changes and clarifications to p:load

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:40:58 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2sl0wcsmd.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| in Section 7.1.13 p:load
| it says
| 'If the value of the validate option is "true", namespace-aware DTD
| validation is performed on the retrieved document. It is a dynamic
| error (err:XC0027) if the document is not valid or the step doesn't
| support DTD validation.'
| should we not rename the option to precisely reflect its meaning
|      <p:option name="dtd-validate"/>

We agreed to do that at the f2f.

| also, is there clarification on schema validation that needs to be made here ?
| also, should we consider an optional option that explicitly defines
| what encoding to expect?
|  <p:option name="encoding"/>

I don't think that we need that. The XML encoding can be determined
by examing the document.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The art of living is more like
http://nwalsh.com/            | wrestling than dancing.--Marcus Aurelius

Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:41:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC