Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Toman_Vojtech writes:

> 2. Empty subpipelines are allowed and they are effectively equivalent to
> the p:identity step

I think that's where we are now, in fact.  That is, I think if you
look carefully at the rules for establishing default inputs and
hooking up outputs, you will find that in e.g. p:for-each, the output
will be connected to the iteration-source, which will make the whole
for-each a giant identity step.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHjm8SkjnJixAXWBoRAo09AJ4kAZP+d3SnKcTiTzh7M6Lu7oktQgCfcv5I
8Eiic0rkKyOweNgRSf3mtsg=
=J9dl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----