W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:06:49 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2sl17vsgm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> was heard to say:
| I understand that using content of p:error element for description
| instead of attribute would cause inconsistency in syntax -- all other
| options in XProc are specified as attributes. So change we are
| requesting is not an easy one. But ITS WG will be pleased if you can
| consider this and decide whether accommodating non-Latin languages can
| be worth small syntax inconsistency.

I think you're right. Making the description an option is a
convenience for authors, but only authors using "western" languages, I

I suggest we change the p:error step so that the description comes
From an input. That also makes it more consistent with errors from other
steps which might be structured.


<p:error name="bad-document" xmlns:my="http://www.example.org/error">
   <p:option name="code" value="my:unk12">
   <p:option name="description" value="The document element is unknown."/>


<p:error name="bad-document" xmlns:my="http://www.example.org/error">
   <p:input port="source">
       <p:inline>The document element is unknown.</p:inline>
   <p:option name="code" value="my:unk12">

It's unfortunate that the extra wrapper element is necessary (to make the
document WF) but it's probably worth living with anyway.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Some people tell you you should not
http://nwalsh.com/            | drink claret after strawberries. They
                              | are wrong.--William Maginn

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:03:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC