W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:55:55 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2y79q2v1g.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
| After reading your e-mail, I noticed a couple of mentions of "direct
| invocation" in the specification. I just haven't seen it before. I think
| it's a really nice feature, so perhaps it deserves more emphasis in the
| specification?

Yes. The spec needs work in that area. Before we monkeyed with the
syntax for pipelines, atomic steps and pipelines were (or appeared to
be) quite different and it wasn't obvious that processors could or
should be able to run atomic steps directly.

Now, they're declarations are completely analagous and I think they
should.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Human felicity is produced not so much
http://nwalsh.com/            | by great pieces of good fortune that
                              | seldom happen, as by little advantages
                              | that occur every day.--Benjamin Franklin

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 12:56:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 February 2008 12:56:08 GMT