[closed] Re: propose a implementation defined warning mechanism

Hi Jim,

The WG discussed this and decided not to make any changes in this
regard. Implementations are free to warn when Mercury is in retrograde
if they want.

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Hello all,
|
| seems like an oversight to not have any concept of warnings in XProc.
|
| I would propose adding a implementation defined warning, not unlike
| many existing specs have.
|
| in section 6 Errors add (either 6.3 or top level) ;
|
| ------------------------
|
| An XProc implementation may also raise warnings at any time during
| XProc processing. The circumstances in which warnings are generated
| and managed are implementation defined.
|
| ------------------------
|
| will also need to add some words here  A.1 Implementation-defined features
|
| cheers, Jim Fuller

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is so comic to hear oneself called
http://nwalsh.com/            | old, even at ninety I suppose.--Alice
                              | James