W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Editorial. Section 2 note

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:06:55 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2zliygmr4.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the
> preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may
> contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline does not.
> Does not what?

Does not contain a subpipeline.

> Does not contain a pipeline? Can an invocation contain anything?

Only input, output, with-option, and with-param.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Never interrupt your enemy when he is
http://nwalsh.com/            | making a mistake.-- Napoleon

Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 03:07:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC