The phrase is used throughout the CR, yet is undefined. I don't think the term is overloaded, though perhaps a definition would make that clear? I'm taking it to mean <doc/> <doc/> <doc/> Is that the intention? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.ukReceived on Sunday, 14 December 2008 09:19:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 14 December 2008 09:19:30 GMT