[closed] Re: exclude-inline-prefixes - #default

ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:

> I agree.  e-i-p has no effect on qualified names in its scope -- they
> are in the namespaces they are in.  e-i-p of #default may have no
> effect in practice, or it may provoke a serialiser's prefix synthesis
> algorithm.
>
> The test ought to have the default binding as in the given test, but
> _no_ unprefixed names in scope.

I believe I added a test to cover that case as well.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As a general rule, the most successful
http://nwalsh.com/            | man in life is the man who has the best
                              | information.--Benjamin Disraeli