W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > December 2008

[closed] Re: exclude-inline-prefixes - #default

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:41:01 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m263lpcpnm.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:

> I agree.  e-i-p has no effect on qualified names in its scope -- they
> are in the namespaces they are in.  e-i-p of #default may have no
> effect in practice, or it may provoke a serialiser's prefix synthesis
> algorithm.
> The test ought to have the default binding as in the given test, but
> _no_ unprefixed names in scope.

I believe I added a test to cover that case as well.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As a general rule, the most successful
http://nwalsh.com/            | man in life is the man who has the best
                              | information.--Benjamin Disraeli

Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 16:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC