I know why p:pipe missing as a valid element from the first definition of p:input at 5.1.1 Document Inputs, e.g. this first usage is when p:input is used in a declaration versus an 'atomic step'. the context of the first usage is not all that clear and propose clarification. JReceived on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 18:53:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 August 2008 18:53:21 GMT