W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > August 2008

clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:52:45 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0808261152r1b14599q671ce29b3fe5755d@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

I know why p:pipe missing as a valid element from the first
definition of p:input at 5.1.1 Document Inputs, e.g. this first usage is
when p:input is used in a declaration versus an 'atomic step'.

the context of the first usage is not all that clear and propose clarification.

J
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 18:53:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC