Re: viewport

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| taking the definition of a sub pipeline
|
| http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#dt-subpipeline
|
| and the definition of viewport
|
| how can the spec example be correct
|
| 4.3.2 Example
|
| or rephrased;
|
|     Is a viewport naturally a subpipeline?

I'm not sure what you mean. A p:viewport is a compound step. The p:viewport
in Example 4.3.2 contains a subpipeline that consists of a single p:insert
step. Where is the conflict?

|     Is it envisaged that the subpipeline, within a viewport, should
| encapsulated.... e.g. should there be a
|
| (p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try|pfx:other-step|p:documentation|ipfx:ignored)*
|
| element? taking the 4.3.2 example

A p:insert is a pfx:other-step :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Simplicity is always a virtue.--Edward
http://nwalsh.com/            | Abbey