W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Primary parameter input port?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:19:56 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2hcl194sz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Sure but I think a misunderstanding is still around
|
| Are "parameter input ports" "input ports" ?

Yes

| If not, why can't we have the notion of "primary parameter input ports" ?

Because we don't have "parameter output ports" so if you had two
primary inputs, what would you hook up to them?

| Do they live in the same space? what kind of property do they share ?

They're both input ports. They just have a different "flavor".

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 12:20:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT