===========Henry S. Thompson=========== So there are two things missing from this that we have in the comparable Markup pipeline: 1) A 'cwd' option, which gives the working directory in which to run the subprocess; ======================================= Which would default to the options' base URI? ===========Henry S. Thompson=========== 2) The ability to take a sequence as input -- the contents are serialised onto stdin in order. I think (1) is important, I can live w/o (2). ======================================= Same here ===========Henry S. Thompson=========== I think we should _either_ make the thing symmetric (i.e. assume the input is already in escaped-document form) _or_ include the serialization options. . . ======================================= What I still can't figure out is why assume the input is XML at all, when most programs out there today won't accept it? Why not make input an option, or a union of all parameters passed on a special input kind="parameter" port, or... anything that would eventually lead to a string, rather than a tree. Regards, Vasil RangelovReceived on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:35:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT