W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2007

Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe?

From: Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 00:36:10 +0300
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <47055c95.1c185e0a.2b26.ffffa62d@mx.google.com>

===========Henry S. Thompson===========
So there are two things missing from this that we have in the
comparable Markup pipeline:

 1) A 'cwd' option, which gives the working directory in which to run
    the subprocess;
Which would default to the options' base URI?

===========Henry S. Thompson===========
 2) The ability to take a sequence as input -- the contents are
    serialised onto stdin in order.

I think (1) is important, I can live w/o (2).
Same here

===========Henry S. Thompson===========
I think we should _either_ make the thing symmetric (i.e. assume the
input is already in escaped-document form) _or_ include the
serialization options. . .
What I still can't figure out is why assume the input is XML at all, when
most programs out there today won't accept it? Why not make input an option,
or a union of all parameters passed on a special input kind="parameter"
port, or... anything that would eventually lead to a string, rather than a

Vasil Rangelov
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:35:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC