W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > May 2007

Re: xprox specification

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:43:08 +0100
To: Yves Bekkers <yves.bekkers@irisa.fr>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5btzu6mjoj.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Yves Bekkers writes:

>   3) I tried to read the provided xproc's XML-Schema it turns out that
> it is not a correct schema.
> I think it should contain the two following namespace declarations in
> the root element of the schema :
> xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/2007/03/xproc"
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"

Which version are you working from?  The version pointed to from the
current WD [1] [2] has those declarations. 

>  4)  xproc's XML-Schema is not self contained as it is refencing
> xml:base and xml:id attributes :

and that import. . .

>  5) there seems to have a problem with the element appearing in the
> atomicStep subtitution group :
> as the element atomicStep is abstract all the elements in the
> subtitution group have the same type so they are abstract,
> hence they cannot by used in pipelines !

The _element_ is declared as abstract, but its _type_ is not defined
to be abstract -- there's no problem.  Abstractness is not inherited,
only the type definition.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070405/
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 12:44:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC