W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2007

Re: micro operations versus xupdate and xquery update extensions

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:33:31 -0400
To: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <87wt0grmc4.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I am interested in the thinking behind XProc defined micro operations
| e.g. especially as it pertains to  overlap with  the use of well
| established (though not necc widely adopted) standards like Xupdate
| and XQuery update extensions.
|
| My preference would be to simplify things and not have micro
| operations if at all possible.

Unlike Xupdate and XQuery update facilities, the micro operations
don't update anything, they are really simple, streaming
transformations.

Does that help clarify things?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 21:35:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT