W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > May 2006

XPath 1.0 vs. XPath 2.0

From: Colin Adams <colinpauladams@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:01:07 +0100
Message-ID: <BAY120-F17D05DD08C8F511123F2A6DAA60@phx.gbl>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

I've been following this discussion with great personal interest.

Concerning the proposal that the basic XSLT-level subset of XPath 2.0 be 
used, I would like to say that I favour this very strongly.

Concerning implementations, I would like to point out that I have an open 
source implementation of just such a subset, which should be usable from all 

I believe sleepycat software (Berkeley DB XML) also have an XPath 2.0 

So Saxon is not the only available implementation.

Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 11:18:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:23 UTC