W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2006

Why XSLT 1.0 specifically?

From: Colin Adams <colinpauladams@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:42:41 +0100
Message-ID: <BAY21-F5D68B65434E99910C2E81DABA0@phx.gbl>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org


Why isn't XSLT 2.0 allowed?

In my environment (Eiffel), I have an XSLT 2.0 processor, but no 1.0 
processor. And noone is going to write a 1.0 processor at this time of the 
century.

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 22:52:03 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Norman Walsh: "Re: Why XSLT 1.0 specifically?"
Previous message: Daniel.Gabi@bk.admin.ch: "AW: Use Case "Create Document""
Next in thread: Norman Walsh: "Re: Why XSLT 1.0 specifically?"
Reply: Norman Walsh: "Re: Why XSLT 1.0 specifically?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT