Paul and Daniel, I am very impressed by your timely and thoughtful reply! My question arose from discussions around the ODF schema. When ODF 1.2 introduces xml:id, can we create a RNG schema, which is consistent with the xml:id recommendation and the RNG DTD compatibility specification? I am happy with Daniel's reply and believe that the use of xsd:NCName in RELAX NG schemas for xml:id is fine. However, it is probably a good idea to publish errata to xml:id and make things clearer. Let me suggest a note in D.3. Note: Since RELAX NG validation does not change the infoset, the use of other datatypes does not cause any problems to xml:id processing. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:09:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:09:01 GMT