- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:25:17 -0500
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, public-xml-id@w3.org, "'xom-interest'" <xom-interest@lists.ibiblio.org>, "'Wolfgang Hoschek'" <whoschek@lbl.gov>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote: > Daniel Veillard wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:59:49PM -0000, Michael Kay wrote: > >>So: it's clear as mud. The processor must "assure that" (assure whom?) the > >>value is an NCName, and it mustn't fail if it isn't. > > > > There is no fatal error in xml:id, a fatal error would mean stopping > >any processing of the XML resource. Failure can only result in reporting > >the error and not registering the ID. > > > > Even so the test suite suggests the ID should be registered. That still > feels like a mistake. yeah, sure, I agree with that. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 16:25:26 UTC