Typo in xml-id spec; canonicalization? from Webb Roberts on 2005-05-03 (public-xml-id@w3.org from May 2005)

From: Webb Roberts <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:54:43 -0400
To: public-xml-id@w3.org
Message-ID: <4277F323.2090507@gtri.gatech.edu>

"XML Schema authors are encouraged to use xml:id attributes exclusively in to indicate element identifiers."

I'm unsure of the status of xml:id with respect to the canonicalization spec.  I'm expecting resistance in introducing xml:id into upcoming vocabularies due to the conflict.  Our domain is definitely concerned with XML signatures, so it's not something that can be ignored.   Any advice?

Webb
-- 
Webb Roberts (webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu)
Research Scientist, Georgia Tech Research Institute
Atlanta, GA  404-385-0181

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:55:29 UTC